news, products, community - hydrocarbons21.com
is the industry platform for hydrocarbon
cooling and heating experts worldwide.

News >> Policy News

EIA warns against results from pro-HFC campaign

29 April 2009

4 comments | rating:
  Login or Register to vote

[ - ] Text [ + ]

Following recent policy developments at the EU and UK level pointing to a potential tightening of restrictions on the use of HFCs, HFC industry proponents have launched a campaign to oppose such advent. In response, environmental group EIA has reiterated its call for a clear HFCs phase-out schedule as a means of achieving required emission reductions.
The Environmental Investigation Agency logo
The Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) has called for the early phase-out of HFCs in response to recent industry efforts to oppose current discussions on policy mandating restricted use of such substances. Such policy developments include the EU draft position paper for the international climate change negotiations in Copenhagen this December, whereby “an international emissions reduction arrangement” for HFCs is called for. A strong EU position on restricting HFC emissions is likely to further affect the 2011 review of the F-Gas regulation so that it includes a phase-out schedule in addition to the existing containment measures. At the UK level, Lord Hunt, Minister for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, has stated that a “restriction on non-essential use” would be considered as part of the government’s F-Gas legislation review.

As the pressure mounts to move away from the use of refrigerants with high global warming potential, HFC industry proponents in the UK have launched a campaign to advocate the essential role and benefits of using HFCs and call for a F-gas containment strategy as the means to addressing HFC emissions instead of a phase out.

EIA: HFC campaign is misguided

However, the EIA said that the campaign is misguided, and called a phase out of HFCs essential as an example to the developing world. “Although it poses significant challenges, a clear phase out schedule offers a strong degree of certainty and enables future planning which is essential to any business”, said EIA global environment campaign co-ordinator Fionnuala Walravens. “As with previous ODS phase outs it would involve a gradual reduction in HFC usage and will not mean that HFCs are banned overnight.” Miss Walravens insisted that a successful opposition of the HFC phase out by the industry would come at the cost of Europe not being able to precede to deeper emission reduction targets.

Already at last month’s RAC Alternative Cooling event, EIA stressed that only a complete ban on using HFCs in all new buildings and installations, and a consequent use of natural refrigerants, would lead to the required emission reductions. With less than 0.46% of all UK stores converted to natural alternatives and 19-33% of a supermarket’s carbon footprint coming from direct HFC refrigerant emissions, Walravens questioned the effectiveness of leakage reduction measures taken by the industry. The EIA is now in concrete talks with the UK government to explore an HFC phase out scheme.

Comments

UK

This is a question I have. Are there sufficient alternatives available in air conditioning, if HFCs are banned in all new buildings ?? Or is it that ban will be effective in few years time when alternatives are avaialble. In the case of refrigeration, enough HC options are available, but what abt air conditioning ?
added 2009-04-30 13:40:48

ammonia21.com

Dear friend, As mentioned above, one should expect a gradual phase out of HFCs with a clear phase out schedule, which means that HFCs will not be banned overnight. Of course such a schedule will take into account the development stage of alternative technologies for the various applications. Best regards, The hydrocarbons21.com Team
added 2009-05-04 10:24:27

Nicholas Cox

Earthcare Products
Single split A/C units using HCs have been available since 1997. Replacing VRF on a like for like basis is harder. Compact minichillers circulating chilled water are widely available. Daikin claim to have a CO2 based VRF system, but I would have thought that an HC primary with CO2 volatile secondary would be more efficient? Nick Cox
added 2009-05-05 12:39:06

jan goedhart

Newtek Consulting
Friends, have been active for 15 years to implement Non Ozone Depleting Substances and Low Global Warming refrigerant fluids. If Chemicalia comes up with some non ODP's and Low Global Warming fluids we have to accept this as long as they tell us the truth. HFO1234yf is such an example may be not an HFC but at least from their side an replacement refrigerant for R134a which we all would like to see abandonned in the near future. We all have to bear in mind that the majority of contractors is small (microbusinesses) with little knowledge about ODP and GWP. I once wrote freely: After 15 years of pushing ands shoving and after 350 million HC fridges and freezers as well as 4.5 million MACs in the US and 450.000 Macs in Australia as well as a couple of hundred thousand Unilever ice-cream freezer running on HC fluids and probably a couple of million of other equipment in our Trade using HCs ( India ,China), and never heard complaints,we finally are getting some initiatives from the Top to do something about Halocarbon refrigerant pollution. Cannot wait long enough to hear their final results but am pretty sure that Chemicalia will have their guns prepared for the reports and in the end the whole refrigeration Industry will choose for R1234yf because there is more money to be made in that refrigerant fluid. Remember still 10 to15% of small contractors turnover is the sale of refrigerant to end-users.(just check the refrigerant use for small contractors for topping up leaking systems, the figures are 75/25). CO2 is far to complicated for most simple minded small refrigeration contractors (85% of all equipment is serviced by this type of companies). Less than 3 % of small contractors can handle Ammonia. Hydrocarbon is an excellent refrigerant for all existing refrigeration equipment but Chemicalia will push for R1234yf because it’s less flammable but luckily for Industry (small contractors)10 times more expensive than R134a.Leak them 90% less so price has to be 10x more than R134a. Like to hear, if possible some comments.. jgoz PS Chemicalia will produce pretty soon I think other HFO's for R22 replacements. Mark my words
added 2009-05-28 05:47:11

To ensure the quality of the comments we receive, you need to be a member to post a comment.
Not a member yet? Register now!